The repetitive work between the real work — inbox triage, order routing, code
review, back-office paperwork — engineered to run itself. One senior
practitioner, four years deep in AI systems, zero agency overhead.
A Claude subscription costs twenty dollars. What it doesn’t include:
knowing when the model is wrong, how pipelines fail silently, where a prompt
becomes a liability — the gap between a demo and a system.
DIY AI builds ship fast and rot faster: unmaintainable prompts, unreviewed
code, automations nobody dares to touch. The tools are commodities.
The judgment isn’t.
Five things, done deeply. No website packages, no logo design, no “digital
transformation” decks.
01/
Inbox & order triage
AI classification and routing for everything that lands in your inbox, CRM, or helpdesk — orders, tickets, supplier mail. Replies drafted, priorities set, every decision logged.
order intake → CRM routing
support triage & deflection
priority queues with escalation rules
Build from$8,000
02/
Developer-workflow automation
AI code review on every pull request, CI-integrated quality and security gates, agentic pipelines tuned to your codebase and your standards — issues caught before your users find them.
PR review agents
CI security & quality gates
release notes that write themselves
Build from$8,000
03/
Vibe-code rescue
Your Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit or Claude-built app works — until it doesn’t. I audit AI-generated codebases against the OWASP Top-10 — broken auth, exposed secrets, injection, silent failures — then harden them into something maintainable and safe to ship. Report plus fixes, not just a PDF.
OWASP Top-10 review
auth, secrets & data-exposure audit
remediation + production hardening
Audit from$3,500
04/
Back-office automation
Multi-step workflows that glue your tools together, with LLM steps where human judgment used to be the bottleneck: documents read, invoices extracted, reports assembled.
n8n / Make pipelines
invoice → ledger extraction
weekly reporting on autopilot
Build from$8,000
05/
AI audit sprint
One week, fixed fee, credited in full against your first build. I map your processes, find what is actually worth automating, put numbers on it, and hand you a build roadmap — useful whether you build with me or not.
process inventory
ROI per candidate
prioritised roadmap
Fixed fee$2,500
How it works
The ladder.
Fixed scopes, no hourly billing. You know the number before we start.
Step 1
Audit
$2,500
fixed · 1 week · credited against your build
Process map, automation candidates, ROI math, roadmap. If I don’t find automations worth at least 10× the fee, you don’t pay.
Step 2
Build
$8,000–25,000
fixed scope · 2–6 weeks
One scoped automation, shipped into your stack and documented. 30 days of support included.
Step 3
Run
from $2,000/mo
optional retainer
Monitoring, evals, iteration. Models change monthly; your automations should keep up.
The studio
A studio of one.
I’m Dani Moiseencov. Six years in IT, the last four working with AI
systems daily — since before ChatGPT made them mainstream. Long enough to
watch the tools become commodities and the skill become the product. Every
automation this studio sells is one I run myself.
Being one person is the feature: the person who scopes your project is the
person who builds it, ships it, and answers when something breaks. No juniors,
no handoffs, no account managers.
Written & maintained by Dani Moiseencov · Updated July 2026
Selected work
From the lab.
A few things I’ve built to solve real problems. Two are open
source; the third is a client platform, shown in outline.
Open source · CLI
primer-ai
A TypeScript CLI for AI-guided refactors, verification/fix loops, AI-ready project scaffolding and automatic release notes — with orchestration and resumable checkpoints. The vibe-code-rescue and dev-workflow services, in tool form.
A local-first engine for multi-agent pipelines — orchestrator → specialised agents → synthesis — with provider routing, output contracts, quality gates and run traces. Built back when models still capped at 200k context.
A content-management platform with AI pipelines that scrape sources (Firecrawl, with BrightData fallback for hard targets), ingest uploaded evidence, auto-generate pages, then route them through human review before publishing.
More on the bench — new work is filed here as it ships.
Questions
Before you ask.
The questions founders actually ask before hiring — answered straight.
How do you price, and what does an engagement cost?
Everything is fixed-fee — you know the number before we start. It begins with a $2,500 one-week audit, credited in full against a build and useful whether you build with me or not. Builds start at $8,000 for a scoped automation; an optional retainer runs from $2,000/month. No hourly billing, no surprise invoices.
What ROI is realistic, and how soon?
For high-volume work like order intake or support triage, a 40–60% cut in manual time within 60–90 days is a reasonable target, and most builds pay for themselves in two to four months. I put the numbers in writing during the audit — and if I can’t find automations worth at least 10× the fee, you don’t pay for it.
Can you fix a “vibe-coded” app — Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Claude?
Yes — it’s a core service. I audit AI-generated codebases against the OWASP Top-10 for broken authentication, exposed secrets, injection and silent failures, then harden the code into something maintainable and safe to ship. You get a prioritised report and the fixes applied, not just a list of problems.
Do I own everything, or am I locked in?
You own everything I deliver — source code, the prompts that run inside the automation, configs and credentials — and it all lives in your accounts from day one, never mine. You get documentation and a runbook so you, or anyone you hire later, can run and change it without me. No vendor lock-in.
Where does my data go? Is it used to train AI models?
Two separate things. In production, your automations run on your own accounts and API keys — your live data flows through your infrastructure and the model provider you choose, never through mine. While I build, I work under NDA: anything of yours I handle (your codebase, any sample data) is used only for your project, with provider “no-training”/privacy mode enabled, and removed once the work ships. Where you need a specific provider, region (e.g. EU) or a zero-retention tier, we build the automation to use it — and I’ll always tell you exactly which models and providers each automation touches.
What won’t you automate?
Anything where human judgment is the point, anything a $20 tool already does well, and any process that’s broken before automation — fixing the workflow comes first. Part of the audit is telling you what isn’t worth automating; “don’t build this” is a legitimate, and common, recommendation.
Is the person who scopes the work the one who builds it?
Always. This is a studio of one — the person who scopes your project is the person who builds it, ships it, and answers when something breaks. No juniors, no handoffs, no account managers between you and the work.
What happens when something breaks at 2am?
Every automation ships with monitoring, logging, error handling and a defined fallback to a safe state — and failures alert me. The optional retainer covers ongoing monitoring, evals and iteration as the models shift underneath you.
Contact
Tell me what your team does on repeat.
If it happens more than once a week, it’s a candidate. Consider this
form the first automation — your note is logged, acknowledged and
routed the moment you send it.